FAQ: Are Bed Rails Allowed in Assisted Living?

Accordion Content

In California, the use of bed rails in assisted living facilities is strictly regulated to protect residents’ safety and dignity.

Half-length bed rails

These extend from the head of the bed and are used only to assist with mobility are allowed (e.g., helping a resident reposition or get out of bed). However, their use must be supported by a physician’s order and included in the resident’s care plan. The bed rails must not function as restraints and must allow for quick release in emergencies.

Full-length bed rails

Which span the entire side of a bed, are generally prohibited due to the risk of entrapment, falls, and reduced mobility. An exception is made for residents in hospice care, but only if the rails are clearly documented as necessary in the individual’s hospice care plan.

These restrictions are based on California Code of Regulations Title 22, Section 87608. They are designed to minimize harm while supporting resident autonomy. Facilities are encouraged to consider safer alternatives such as low beds, floor mats, or motion alarms whenever possible.

In summary, bed rails may be used under specific conditions, but their implementation in assisted living settings requires careful planning, documentation, and a focus on resident safety.

In California assisted living facilities the use of physical restraints is highly restricted and regulated to protect resident rights and safety.

What is a Physical Restraint?

A physical restraint is defined as any device or equipment that is attached to or near a resident’s body and restricts their movement or access to their body, and which the resident cannot easily remove on their own. Common examples include belts, vests, restrictive chairs, certain wheelchairs, and full-length bed rails.

• The state allows physical restraints only under strict conditions:
• A written order from a physician is required.
• The restraint must be used for medical necessity, not staff convenience.

It must be part of a documented care plan and used for the shortest time possible.

Some supportive devices like half-length bed rails or tray tables are permitted if used to help with mobility or posture, however not to confine or limit movement.

These rules are grounded in California Code of Regulations Title 22, which prioritizes resident autonomy, dignity, and safety. Facilities are encouraged to consider less restrictive alternatives, such as low beds, bed alarms, or individualized fall prevention strategies.

Basically, any device that limits a resident’s freedom of movement and that they cannot remove on their own may be considered a restraint, and its use is tightly controlled under state law.

In assisted living facilities, physical restraints such as belts, bed rails, or restrictive chairs are employed only as a last resort, strictly to prevent immediate harm to residents or others.

Only After Other Options Fail

Restraints are used only when less restrictive interventions, like alarms, low beds, mats, environmental modifications, or increased supervision, have proven ineffective

To Prevent Immediate Risk

They may be applied to reduce the risk of falls, prevent harm from wandering or interference with medical devices, or to manage aggressive or unsafe behaviors .

Guided by a Comprehensive Plan

Use must be part of a care plan, developed collaboratively with the resident (or their representative) and family, and include clear objectives, time limits, monitoring procedures, and consent.

Evidence and Ethical Standards

• Studies show that restraint use does not reliably prevent falls, and may actually increase risk and harm
• Extended restraint can lead to physical problems (pressure sores, muscle atrophy, incontinence) and emotional distress (agitation, depression)
• Ethical best practices require staff to prioritize resident autonomy, dignity, and freedom, using restraint only when absolutely necessary

Safety Monitoring Required

Once implemented, restraints must be regularly reassessed, and removed as soon as the risk has passed. Staff must document reasons, duration, and outcomes. Policies must favor finest alternatives first, with restraints as a temporary, supervised measure.

Bed rails are often used to support mobility, but they pose serious hazards, especially in assisted living and memory care.

Entrapment, Strangulation & Suffocation
According to the FDA, between 1985 and 2009, there were 803 incidents of entrapment, entanglement, or strangulation in beds with rails, resulting in 480 deaths. Victims were often frail, confused, or dementia-affected residents.

Falls During Climbing Attempts
Residents, particularly those with cognitive impairment, may try to climb over rails, leading to heightened falls, head injuries, fractures, and other trauma.

Reduced Mobility & Physical Decline
Relying on rails can cause muscle weakness, imbalance, and deconditioning—further increasing fall risk.

Pressure Sores & Skin Issues
Limited movement in bed can lead to pressure ulcers, bruising, scrapes, and contractures.

Psychological Distress
Rails may evoke feelings of confinement, agitation, confusion, anxiety, and reduced autonomy, especially for those with dementia.

While bed rails are often intended to prevent falls, evidence shows their impact is mixed—and may even heighten risk.

Inconsistent Effectiveness
A 2021 systematic review found that bed rails can be beneficial, harmful, or neutral in preventing falls—results vary significantly across settings.

Risk from Climbing Attempts
Some residents, particularly those with cognitive impairment, may attempt to climb over the rails, increasing the chance of a more dangerous fall.

Safer Alternatives Recommended
Leading best practices suggest using ultra-low beds, floor mats, motion sensors, and position-change alerts—all supported by more consistent safety outcomes.

Alarm Systems Provide Limited Help
Bed-exit alarms, though intended to alert staff, have not shown consistent fall reduction. One study noted increased alarm use without a decrease in falls or restraints.

Tech-Assisted Solutions Show Promise
Recent trials using IoT-enabled sensors (pressure mats, motion detection, app alerts) reported up to 88% reduction in bed-related falls—though evidence remains limited and context-dependent.

In California, the use of physical restraints in assisted living communities—legally known as Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFEs) is governed by the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Section 72082.

This regulation defines a physical restraint as any method or device that restricts a resident’s movement and cannot be easily removed by the resident. Examples include belts, vests, full-length bed rails, or deep chairs that prevent standing.

Legal Requirements

According to CCR Title 22 §72082, physical restraints:

• Must be used only when absolutely necessary to prevent immediate harm to the resident or others.
• Are permitted only with a physician’s written order and must be included in the resident’s care plan.
• Cannot be used for staff convenience or as punishment.
• Must be monitored closely, with documentation of purpose, duration, and outcomes.

Resident Rights

The regulation emphasizes that physical restraints must never infringe on a resident’s right to dignity, freedom of movement, and personal autonomy. All decisions regarding restraint use must be made in collaboration with the resident, their physician, and—when appropriate—their family or legal representative.

Preferred Approach

California law supports a least-restrictive approach, requiring that all other alternatives—such as environmental modifications, increased supervision, or mobility aids—be tried and ruled ineffective before restraints are considered.

Research consistently shows that using physical restraints on elderly residents —such as belts, full-length bed rails, or restrictive chairs — can cause profound psychological and emotional harm, often outweighing any short-term safety benefits.

Reduced Autonomy and Emotional Strain

Restraints strip residents of control over their own bodies, leading to feelings of helplessness, anger, fear, humiliation, and demoralization. Personal accounts describe the experience as dehumanizing, causing loss of dignity and even triggering memories of past trauma.

Depression, Anxiety, and Social Isolation

Studies link restraint use to:

• Increased rates of depression and anxiety
• Sleep disruption and agitation
• Withdrawal from social interaction

Residents may feel stigmatized or fearful, which worsens emotional wellbeing

Cognitive Decline

Long-term restraint use may also accelerate cognitive decline, particularly among residents with existing impairments. One study connected restraint use to faster deterioration in mental status over time. Additionally, social confinement exacerbates isolation, further compromising cognitive health.

Staff Emotional Impact

It’s not just residents who suffer. Caregivers often experience guilt, sadness, ethical conflict, and emotional distress when they’re forced to apply restraints.

Evidence shows that prolonged use of physical restraints — including full-length bed rails — can cause serious physical harm to elderly residents, undermining their health and independence.

Decreased Mobility & Muscle Atrophy
Extended immobilization leads to rapid muscle wasting and weakness. Studies indicate significant loss of muscle mass and strength can begin within just a few days of restrained inactivity.

Joint Stiffness & Contractures
Lack of movement can cause joint stiffness and permanent contractures, severely limiting range of motion and functional ability.

Pressure Ulcers (Bed Sores)
Continuous pressure from bed rails or prolonged pressure in one position inhibits blood flow, often resulting in painful pressure injuries. These wounds can lead to dangerous infections, prolonged hospitalization, and even systemic complications.

Increased Risk of Injury & Serious Complications
Physical restraints are associated with higher risks of:

• Falls and fractures
• Deep vein thrombosis
• Nerve damage and infections
• Respiratory issues
• Longer hospital stays

Functional Decline & Mortality Risk
Research indicates that use of restraints correlates with substantial functional decline — twice the risk in some cases — as well as extended hospital stays and higher mortality rates.

Postural supports—devices such as soft ties, seat belts, spring-release trays, cloth vests, or braces—are designed to help residents maintain proper posture, balance, and mobility. However, per California regulations, they are not considered physical restraints, provided they are used appropriately.

Legal & Clinical Standards
Definition: Under California Title 22 § 72319, postural supports are “methods other than orthopedic braces … used to assist patients to achieve proper body position and balance” and “shall not be considered restraints” when used to enhance independence and prevent falls.

Allowed types include:

• Soft ties
• Spring-release trays
• Cloth vests
• Seat belts
• Physician-prescribed braces
• Bed rails less than half the length of the bed when used for mobility support

Key Conditions
Postural supports are acceptable only if:

• Clinically justified by a physician and documented in the resident’s care plan
• Quickly releasable by the resident to prevent entrapment or limitation of limbs
• Never used to restrict hands or feet, immobilize, or serve as punishment

When They Become Restraints
Postural supports cross the line into being physical restraints when they are used:

• Unnecessarily, without clinical need
• To limit movement or access to the body
• Without proper consent, documentation, or the ability for rapid release
• If they immobilize hands or feet or are attached in a way that restricts voluntary movement

Research & Best Practices
Clinical guidelines and studies emphasize the importance of distinguishing between supportive aids and restraint devices. Proper posture support can be beneficial, but misuse may cause physical harm—and legally qualify as restraint.

Best practice guidance recommends thorough seating assessments to ensure supports are therapeutic, not restrictive, and regularly reviewed for necessity.

Research into fall prevention emphasizes that using alternatives to full-length bed rails can be both safer and more effective — focusing on preserving resident independence while minimizing injury risk.

Low‑profile or Floor Beds
Beds positioned close to the floor reduce the height of a potential fall. Combined with side mats, they decrease injury severity and maintain freedom of movement.

Fall Mats / Crash Mats
Placed beside the bed, high-density foam mats cushion falls without restricting residents. They are widely recommended as safer alternatives to side rails.

Bed‑exit Detection Alarms
Pressure‑sensitive mats or mattress sensors alert staff when a resident attempts to leave the bed. Trials show they can reduce falls and allow for timely assistance.
Key to their effectiveness are:

• Proper setup
• Customization
• Staff training

Foam Wedges and Bolster Pillows
Positioning aids placed along bed edges help prevent accidental rolling without restricting movement. Combined with low‑profile beds and mats, they enhance safety.

Adjustable Beds & Mobility Aids
Electric or crank-adjustable beds that raise or lower height, along with trapeze bars, vertical transfer poles, or grab rails, enable residents to move safely with support.

Implementation Considerations

• Individualized fall-risk assessment should guide selection of alternatives.
• Staff should receive training on installation and monitoring, especially for alarms and sensors.
• Balance must be struck: very low beds may make transfers difficult for some individuals.
• Combining strategies—for example, a low bed, fall mat, and bed alarm—often provides the best protection.

In Summary

• Low beds and mats reduce fall injury risk and maintain independence.
• Alarms facilitate proactive caregiving without limiting movement.
• Bolsters, wedges, adjustable beds, and poles offer posture support and safer transfer options.
• Customization and staff education are key to ensuring these alternatives are both effective and dignified.

Research shows that well-designed fall risk assessments significantly reduce reliance on physical restraints in assisted living settings by identifying individual risk factors and enabling targeted preventive interventions.

Personalized Identification of Risk Factors
Comprehensive assessments — like the Hendrich II or Timed Up and Go —evaluate gait, balance, vision, medications, cognitive status, and history of falls. Recognizing contributors to fall risk allows care teams to create individualized prevention plans, avoiding blanket restrictions.

Multidomain Interventions Over Restraints
Multifactorial strategies—combining:

• Physical therapy
• Exercise
• Environmental adaptations
• Medication review
• Assistive devices

have proven effective, reducing fall rates by around 30–40% in nursing home settings. Studies consistently show that physical restraints do not significantly reduce falls — and may even cause harm.

Behavioral Monitoring & Staff Support
Fall assessments often result in changes such as increased supervision, staff prompts, or scheduled checks during risky times. These alternatives maintain resident autonomy without restricting movement. Educating residents about their personal risk has also been shown to lower fall rates.

Data‑Driven Care Plans
Incorporating fall assessment findings into comprehensive care plans ensures interventions are:

• Evidence-based
• Regularly reviewed

This dynamic approach helps minimize the need for physical restraints while optimizing safety. Ongoing team reviews facilitate timely adjustments and restraint avoidance.

In Summary

• Fall risk assessments reveal individual risk drivers—health, environment, behavior.
• Targeted interventions (exercise, environment fixes, med adjustments) prevent falls without restraints.
• Evidence-based methods reduce falls by 30–40%, while restraints offer no proven benefit.
• Personalized care planning and regular reassessment support safety and autonomy together.

A restraint-free philosophy centers on treating residents with dignity, autonomy, and a focus on mental wellbeing. It aligns with ethical caregiving principles and California regulations mandating the use of the least restrictive interventions.

Centered on Resident Dignity and Freedom
Every resident has the right to a dignified life, including self-determination, choice, and participation in daily routines. A restraint-free culture supports these rights by avoiding unnecessary limitations and encouraging shared decision-making.

Supportive of Mental and Emotional Wellbeing
Eliminating restraints reduces feelings of helplessness and isolation. Studies document that restraint-free environments promote:

• Social engagement
• Emotional stability
• Overall psychological health

Legally and Ethically Mandated
Federal and California standards require that restraints (physical or chemical) be used only as a last resort, for medical necessity, and with informed consent. Staff must first implement less restrictive options and document resident involvement in decisions.

Person-Centered, Not Institution-Centered
Rather than adhering to institutional routines, caregivers work with residents to identify individual needs and preferences, and creatively tailor care plans. This approach supports autonomy even within supportive structures.

Cultivating a Culture of Compassion
A restraint-free mindset prioritizes:

• Training
• Alternative interventions
• Ongoing review

In Summary

• Adopting a restraint-free philosophy in assisted living nurtures resident dignity.
• Supports emotional health.
• Meets legal standards.
• Positions care around each individual’s life—not institutional convenience.

That’s compassionate, principled, and effective caregiving in action.

Even when requested by a resident or family member, the use of bed rails in California assisted living facilities must fully comply with strict legal and safety standards — it’s not solely a matter of personal preference.

What California Law Requires
Half-length bed rails (covering only the head half of the bed) may be used, but only to assist mobility — such as helping a resident reposition or get in and out of bed — and only with a physician’s written order documented in the resident’s care plan.

Full-length bed rails (extending the entire bed) are prohibited unless the resident is in hospice care and their hospice plan details the need for them

Requests—even with consent—must follow law and cannot override safety regulations or documentation requirements.

The Role of Consent and Documentation
Facilities are required to:

• Obtain informed consent from the resident or representative, including discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives.
• Ensure the physician’s order clearly states clinical justification, not just personal request.
• Document the request and decision process in the care plan, noting alternatives tried and maintenance protocols.

Safety Assessments Are Mandatory
Before any bed rail is used, the facility must:

• Conduct a thorough assessment of risks (e.g., entrapment, falls, cognitive status) and benefits.
• Confirm proper installation and compatibility with bed dimensions.
• Schedule ongoing maintenance checks and hands-on monitoring to prevent injuries.

Why Requests Alone Aren’t Enough
Even with a family’s support, unsafe use — such as installing full-length rails or omitting assessments — can result in entrapment, falls, or regulatory violations.

Comprehensive staff training in Memory Care Facilities is fundamental in reducing physical restraint use in assisted living and long‑term care. Research demonstrates that well-structured, ongoing training programs empower caregivers to identify safer alternatives and respond compassionately to behavioral and mobility challenges.

Training Increases Knowledge, Skills & Confidence
Multifactorial programs led by nurse specialists and unit leaders—including education, policy reinforcement, consultation, and alternative interventions—have shown significant reductions in restraint use and improvements in staff knowledge, attitudes, and behavior.

Even in dementia care, training spanning a full day with monthly follow-ups cut restraint use by 54%, compared to an 18% increase in control groups.

Education Alone Isn’t Enough—Organizational Support Matters
Simple classroom sessions may raise awareness but typically fail to lower restraint frequency.
Comprehensive programs that include:

• Policy integration
• Leadership commitment
• Sustained support over at least six weeks

are associated with meaningful reductions in restraint use—while maintaining or even reducing fall incidents.

Focus on Alternatives & Resident-Centered Care
Training emphasizes identifying non-restrictive strategies such as:

• Environmental modifications
• Behavioral support
• Mobility aids
• Staff-led fall prevention

Staff learn to view restraint as a last resort, employing de-escalation and compassionate monitoring to keep residents safe without limiting autonomy.

Cultivating Cultural Change
For restraint reduction to stick, training must be embedded in a broader cultural shift—supported by leadership, shared decision-making, and open communication among staff, residents, and families. Studies from settings in South Korea, Spain, and elsewhere underscore the importance of this systemic transformation.

In summary

• Comprehensive, well-supported staff training is key to reducing restraint use.
• When caregivers are equipped with knowledge and tools—and organizational support—restraints are significantly reduced.
• These improvements are achieved without compromising resident safety.

To ensure both the safety and well-being of residents, assisted living facilities can apply a multi-dimensional strategy—leveraging assessments, customized care, environmental design, smart technology, and active collaboration.

Regular Assessments & Individualized Care Plans
Frequent fall-risk evaluations (like the Hendrich II or Timed Up and Go tests) identify each resident’s specific risks—postural instability, vision, cognition, or medication side effects—and underpin tailored care plans that guide effective interventions.

Environmental Modifications
Adjustments to the living environment—such as removing trip hazards, enhancing lighting, adding grab bars, and ensuring furniture variety—dramatically reduce risk. Research shows environmental changes are among the most recommended and effective fall prevention measures.

Technology-Based Alerts
Bed or chair alarms, pressure sensors, motion-detecting devices, and surveillance technology support timely staff responses and compensate for supervision gaps. These tools significantly reduce fall incidents when paired with proper education and monitoring.

Increased Supervision & Staffing
Strategic scheduling during high-risk periods (e.g., nighttimes or medication hours) ensures residents receive required attention. Enhanced staffing levels or buddy systems help deliver supervision without resorting to restraints.

Open Communication & Family Involvement
Engaging residents and families in care planning fosters trust and cooperation. Regular plan reviews—updating based on health changes—support shared decision-making and reduce reliance on restrictive measures.

In Summary

• A multi-modal approach — comprising personalized assessments, environmental safety, smart technology, considerate staffing, and family collaboration — can significantly reduce fall risk while preserving freedom and dignity.
• These strategies align with research and best practices showing that safety does not have to compromise personal liberty.